Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Leaders Emerge by Talking First and Most Often

I found this article on Psyblog about explaining what we as individuals perceive as "leaders" and how they usually emerge. The question, or main point, was what is it about these individuals that set them apart from the others in the group; which in turn gives them the privilege of being the leader (head of the group)?

Two studies were performed to test that theory. The first of the two studies observed how "dominant" individuals were perceived by their peers (in the group). The findings showed that being seen as both competent and an equal is very important. If a person is competent, but not seen as an equal with their peers within the group; they will not obtain a leadership role. Also, study found that there is a huge gap between actual competence or qualifications and what others perceive or tend to think. In the second study they focused on problems with competition. This was done through video-taping participants behaviors within the groups. The observations proved that those individuals that were dominant and outspoken were more often than not seen as being competent. This was true when they would make suggestions to the group and behaviors. So, those who spoke most often and first were usually considered competent. In essence, this study shows that those who make a greater verbal contribution usually are viewed as the leaders within a particular group. (This is because others within the group tend to think that those who speak the most will lead them to success.)

In spite of what these two studies show, the article goes on to state, that in reality world leaders and CEO's of corporations tend to have those positions more due to money and power; instead of outspokenness and perceived competence. The studies, however, apply more too informal everyday life situations verses prestigious leadership positions.

While I thought this article had several good points; I found myself differing in opinion on a few things. I consider myself to be somewhat of a leader. I hold various officer positions at school and I don't think that I obtained any of them by being the loudest or by constantly talking. I personally believe that I was elected to those positions; because of my credentials, hard work, and dedication. I would be interested in hearing what you think about this article, along with whether the people you know get informal leadership roles by being outspoken or if they truly deserved them.

2 comments:

  1. Hey Jess. I read this article too. I'm not sure if i did a blog on it or not. But i too thought it was really interesting. It is really truthful too. Its nice to see in writing how you can tell who the leader is, and see the characteristics of one. When you were talking about how you are a leader, i really do agree with you, sure you arn't the loudest, but you always have your opinion on a topic and stick to it though the end. You always have a good fight for something and that is a GREAT characteristic of a leader. I think some people deserve to be leaders, like you. But other people, like leaders in gangs and stuff, they don't deserve to be leaders at all. Good blog. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmm… interesting. I definitely agree that those who talk more in a group or are the first to usually talk are considered leaders. Also I think that those who are more apt to making suggestions are leaders because that’s what a leader does; they suggest things to make something more beneficial. However, I don’t think that a leader has to talk all the time and make all the suggestions either. Great blog!

    ReplyDelete